whatisrpm.com

Revenue wing / head-to-head

AdSense vs Ezoic

Reviewed08·2026

The first switch most publishers ever consider: from Google's set-and-forget default to a platform that tests layouts for a living. Three things mechanically change; one important thing is not published anywhere.

By Oliver Wakefield-Smith. Oliver Wakefield-Smith runs a portfolio of ad-monetized publisher sites and reads these dashboards weekly.

What mechanically changes

AdSense vs Ezoic mechanics, verified 2026-08-01
DimensionAdSenseEzoic
Revenue modelPublished 80% after platform fee (~68% of total spend) Google AdSense Help2026-08Levels program terms; no flat % printed Ezoic2026-08
Reported metricPage RPM Google AdSense Help2026-08EPMV Ezoic2026-08
IntegrationAd code snippetsPlatform integration (DNS/CDN or plugin)
OptimizationYour manual placements plus auto adsAutomated multivariate layout testing
EntryPolicy review, no minimumNo minimum since Access Now (Oct 2021)

The metric switch will confuse your history

AdSense month: $240 on 24,000 pageviews = $10.00 page RPM
same money in Ezoic terms at 1.5 pages/session: 16,000 visits
EPMV = 240 ÷ 16,000 × 1,000 = $15.00

Identical earnings, a number 50% bigger. Before/after comparisons across the switch must convert bases or they will manufacture an uplift that never happened; the conversion is on the basis page.

Risks and reversibility

  • Reversible: ad serving. Removing the integration returns you to plain AdSense; keep your AdSense account in good standing through the test.
  • Test-window risk: automated testing needs traffic and weeks; judging it inside a seasonal swing corrupts the read. Mind the calendar on the seasonality page.
  • Site-speed risk: any added layer must be measured on your own Core Web Vitals, not the vendor's claims.

What is published about uplift, and what is not

Ezoic publishes named case studies with figures on its own site; they are marketing selections, evidence that uplift can happen, not what yours will be. A per-site projection is not published by either company not published. The honest procedure: run the switch as an experiment with a dated before/after on one basis, and price the outcome in the calculator before making it permanent.