whatisrpm.com

Revenue wing / compare

Ad network comparison, done on published terms

Reviewed08·2026

Comparing ad networks means comparing what they print: thresholds, shares, bases and program terms. This hub routes you to the head-to-head that matches your traffic tier and names the comparisons that cannot honestly be made.

By Oliver Wakefield-Smith. Oliver Wakefield-Smith runs a portfolio of ad-monetized publisher sites and reads these dashboards weekly.

Find your fork by traffic tier

Ad network decision chooser by traffic tier
Your trafficThe live decisionHead-to-head
Under 10,000 PVAdSense simplicity vs Ezoic optimizationAdSense vs Ezoic
10,000 to 25,000 (sessions/PV)Journey's in-family path vs Ezoic's open platformJourney vs Ezoic
25,000 to 50,000Stay self-serve or jump to the first premium barAdSense vs Mediavine
Around 50,000 sessionsThe classic mid-tier decisionEzoic vs Mediavine
Clearing both premium barsThe premium head-to-headMediavine vs Raptive

The dimensions comparisons can honestly use

  • Entry thresholds: all published; collected with sources in the table.
  • Revenue shares: published for AdSense Google AdSense Help2026-08, Mediavine Mediavine Help2026-08 and Raptive Raptive Help2026-08; program-terms-only for Ezoic and Journey; unpublished for the quote-only three.
  • Reporting basis: page vs session vs EPMV, the conversion trap covered on session RPM.
  • Payment terms, fees, exclusivity: published unevenly; quoted where they exist.

The comparisons that cannot honestly be made

"Which network gives higher RPM for my site" has no published answer for any pair, because per-site uplift is not published by anyone not published. The head-to-heads on this site therefore compare terms and mechanics, then hand you to the what-if dial to price your own scenarios. Any comparison page elsewhere that prints "Network X RPM: $14-22" without a named, dated source is quoting the air.