What Monumetric publishes
| Term | Published value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Entry tier (Propel) | 10,000 to 80,000 monthly pageviews | Monumetric2026-10 |
| Setup fee at entry scale | $99 one-time implementation fee | Monumetric2026-10 |
| Propel geography | Minimum 50% of traffic from the US, UK, Canada and Australia | Monumetric2026-10 |
| Higher tiers | Ascend 80k-500k, Stratos 500k-10M, Apollo 10M+ pageviews a month | Monumetric2026-10 |
| Revenue share | not published | n/a |
| Typical RPM figures | not published | n/a |
| Reporting basis | not published | Confirmed at onboarding |
That is the full public picture. This site quotes no Monumetric revenue share and no Monumetric RPM range because Monumetric prints neither; any review that quotes them is reporting private quotes or repeating other blogs.
How a buyer should handle the gaps
- Get the revenue share in writing during the quote conversation, including what is deducted before the split.
- Confirm the reporting basis (page, session or impression) so you can compare honestly.
- Ask what the $99 implementation fee covers and whether it applies outside Propel; the published program page lists it on Propel Monumetric2026-10.
- Benchmark the offer against the published-terms networks in the table before signing anything exclusive.
Who should shortlist Monumetric
Sites in the 10,000 to 25,000 pageview band sit below Raptive's bar, which makes Monumetric one of the few managed options at that scale alongside Journey; Ezoic now wants 250,000+ monthly active users from new sites (see Ezoic). A managed service with human onboarding is the pitch; whether it beats the self-serve platforms for your site is exactly the number they will quote you privately, so make them quote it.